Move from grant-by-grant reporting to portfolio evidence, learning and funding intelligence.
See patterns, gaps, outcomes and influence across a grant portfolio without forcing every partner into one heavy operating system.
Request a demoBoards see delivery volume, not use and contribution.
Five gaps funders describe, and what DER does about each.
Where evidence gets stuck
What it costs the institution
How DER fills the gap
Where evidence gets stuck
Grantees report in inconsistent formats and vocabularies
What it costs the institution
Portfolio synthesis is slow, manual and biased toward what is easy to count
How DER fills the gap
Common metadata and taxonomy with flexible ingestion and grantee-specific mappings
Where evidence gets stuck
Activity and output reporting dominates
What it costs the institution
Boards see delivery volume but not credible outcomes, use or contribution
How DER fills the gap
Evidence-to-impact chain linking grants, outputs, products, verified cases and follow-through
Where evidence gets stuck
Evidence gaps and duplication are difficult to see
What it costs the institution
Funding decisions repeat research or neglect under-evidenced priorities
How DER fills the gap
Cross-grant search, relationship mapping, thematic and geographic views and gap analysis
Where evidence gets stuck
Positive narratives can be detached from supporting evidence
What it costs the institution
Reputational and assurance risk
How DER fills the gap
Source-linked claims, review authority, evidence-strength labels and audit history
Where evidence gets stuck
Learning does not reliably return to grantees
What it costs the institution
The same reporting burden persists without collective improvement
How DER fills the gap
Shared learning products, controlled portfolio views and reusable feedback loops
Products this group creates from one governed source.
Portfolio syntheses
Board evidence briefs
Thematic and geographic learning maps
Evidence-gap analyses
Investment cases
Grantee learning packs
Funding opportunity and decision records
IATI-aligned publication packages
Verified impact stories
Likely business owners
Programmes, learning and evaluation, and grants teams
Typical starting package
DER Portfolio.
See what your portfolio knows, what it repeats, what it changes and where the next grant should go.
DER creates a governed evidence layer across diverse grantees without forcing every partner into one heavy operating system. It connects grant records, outputs and results; synthesises evidence into board and public products; and distinguishes reach from verified use, uptake and follow-through.
Capabilities shown are the configuration DER is designed around. Scope, integrations and timelines are agreed with each institution.
See it on your own evidence.
A short discovery conversation, then a demonstration built around your priority decision or release.